A Note on the Multiplicative AHP
نویسنده
چکیده
The paper concerns the pairwise comparison method used to rank a finite, usually small number of alternatives, in the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which belongs to a certain class of multiple attribute decision making methods. Ranking of alternatives is calculated based on expert judgments expressing relative importance for each pair of alternatives. From mathematical point of view calculation of weights associated with alternatives leads to approximation of a judgement matrix created based on expert opinions, by a matrix of weights ratios. There are two main approximation techniques: the maximal eigenvalue method and logarithmic least squares one. The study focuses on the former one showing its multiplicative properties. An illustrative numerical example is included. Key-Words: Pairwise Comparisons, Relative Weights, Logarithmic Regression, Maximal Eigenvalue Method, Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Analytic Hierarchy Process, Rank Preservation
منابع مشابه
Evaluative Criteria for Aggregation Rules in the Analytic Hierarchy Process
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) has been considerably criticized for its possible rank reversal phenomenon. Many variants of the original AHP have been proposed to preserve rank orders. The validity of the original AHP and its variants have been a subject of long-lasting debate. In this paper we propose four criteria to evaluate the validity of AHP aggregation rules and examine three typic...
متن کاملTwo New Cases of Rank Reversals when the AHP and Some of its Additive Variants are Used that do not Occur with the Multiplicative AHP
Many researchers have long observed some cases in which certain ranking irregularities can occur when the original analytic hierarchy process (AHP), or some of its variants, are used. This paper presents two new categories of ranking irregularities which defy common intuition. These ranking irregularities occur when one decomposes a decision problem into a set of smaller problems each defined o...
متن کاملInfluence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHP
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the most popular multi-attribute decision aid methods. However, within AHP, there are several competing preference measurement scales and aggregation techniques. In this paper, we compare these possibilities using a decision problem with an inherent trade-off between two criteria. A decision-maker has to choose among three alternatives: two extremes an...
متن کاملThe Least Deviation Priority Method for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Complementary Judgment Matrix and Its Application
In this paper, the definition of multiplicative intuitionistic fuzzy consistent complementary judgment matrix(MIFCCJM) is given, then based on the aspect of multiplicative intuitionistic fuzzy consistent complementary judgment matrix(MIFCCJM) formed by priority weights approximatives actual intuitionistic fuzzy complementary judgment matrix(IFCJM), a least deviation priority method for intuitio...
متن کاملCommentary on "Evaluating the criteria for human resource for science and technology (HRST) based on an integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy DEMATEL approach"
Chou et al. (Applied Soft Computing 12 (2012) 64-71) used combination of fuzzy AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) and fuzzy DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) in human resource for science and technology (HRST). For applying the fuzzy DEMATEL method there is a need to find the multiplicative inverse of a fuzzy matrix. In this paper, it is pointed out that the method, used b...
متن کامل